(About 1175-1258)
Bishop of Passau 1233-1250, follower of the emperor Friedrich
II,
Trouble with Rom
|
About 1175 |
Born as member of the family Itzling-Fischach-Zaisberg-Bergheim-Radecker of Salzburg. |
|
From 1198 |
Canon of Salzburg |
|
1208-1211 |
Priest of Salzburghofen and master of hospital |
|
From 1212 |
Rüdiger belongs to the group of people around the archbishop of Regenburg, who came from Salzburg |
|
Till 1215 |
Probst of Augustinerchorherrenstift Zell am See |
|
From 1215 |
Canon of Passau |
|
1216 |
First bishop of the new founded "Salzburger Eigenbistum" Chiemsee. He is consecrated by archbishop Eberhard at Herrenchiemsee. |
|
27.06.1233 |
Pope Gregor IX sends him to Passau to succeed bishop Gebhard of Plain, because after one year had passed by, the chapter was still not able to find a candidate. |
|
1233-1250 |
Bishop of Passau, follower of the emperor Friedrich II |
|
1240 |
Albert Behaim excommunicates him because his blamed for being follower of the emperor Friedrich II |
|
1248 |
Rüdiger is removed for the benefit of Konrad, the son of the duke of Silesia. But he was not acknowledged by the Curia until the year 1249 |
|
1249 |
Renewal of the excommunication and Pope Innozenz IV demands his resignation |
|
17.02.1250 |
Once again renewal of the excommunication and Petrus de Collemedio, who was legate and cardinal removes him |
|
11.03.1250 |
Pope Innocent IV confirms the removal |
|
Fall 1250 |
The new bishop Berthold enters the city of Passau |
|
1258 |
Rüdiger dies. |
Evaluation: From the beginning life was not easy for Rüdiger in Passau. He often ran out of money, because of his splendid lifestyle. After his excommunication he lost Vilshofen in the year 1240. At the same time Rüdiger could not hold the fiefs of Ortenburg. Because of Rüdiger’s weakness, Otto II, the duke of Bavaria, was able to plunder the surrounding area of Passau. He got into trouble with the Curia in Rom because he was a follower of the emperor Friedrich II. He lost against his counterpart Albert Behaim and was finally excommunicated and removed. Rüdiger was the looser in the conflict between the emperor and the pope.
Remarkable: In the year 1245 Rüdiger was blamed for manslaughter, simonie and wasting of possession of the church. There was no reason to blame Rüdiger, but this was the only way for the Pope to pressurize Rüdiger. Rüdiger was the only Bavarian bishop who stand by the Wittelsbacher.
bearbeitet von: Marion Lischke
Translation: Markus Schönberger
worked out by: Marion Lischke
translation by: Markus Schönberger
(2004/24.8.2005)